|







|
|
|
 |
|

|
|
|

|
|
|

Your Rights:
The
National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) gives employees the right to
assistance from union representation during investigatory interviews.
Although not explicit in the Act, the right was declared by the US
Supreme Court in 1975 in NLRB vs. J. Weingarten, Inc. The rules the
court announced are known as Weingarten rights.
Employees
sometime confuse the Weingarten rules with the Miranda rules. However
there is a big difference in the two rules. Under Miranda rules police
who question criminal suspects MUST notify them of their right to
remain silent and to have an attorney present during questioning.
Under Weingarten employers have NO obligation to inform the employees
of their rights to union representation. The employee must ask for
union representation in such meetings.
An
investigatory interview occurs when:
 |
Management questions an employee to obtain information and |
 |
The
employee has a reasonable belief that discipline or other adverse
consequence may result from what he or she says. |
Investigatory interviews relate to such subjects as:
 |
absenteeism |
 |
accidents |
 |
compliance with work rules |
 |
damage
to company property |
 |
drinking |
 |
drugs |
 |
falsification of records |
 |
lateness, poor attitude |
 |
poor
work performance |
 |
sabotage |
 |
slowdowns |
 |
theft |
 |
violations of safety rules |
Not every
discussion with management is an investigatory interview. For example,
a supervisor may speak to an employee about the proper way to do a
job. Even if the supervisor asks the employee questions, this is not
an investigatory interview as the use or possibility of discipline is
remote.
However a
routine conversation changes character if a supervisor becomes
dissatisfied with an employee’s answers and takes a hostile attitude.
If this happens, the meeting becomes an investigatory interview and
Weingarten rules apply.
When a
supervisor calls an employee to the office to announce a warning or
other discipline that has already been decided it is not an
investigatory meeting since the supervisor is just informing the
employee of a previously arrived-at decision. Such a meeting becomes
an investigatory interview, however, if the supervisor asks questions
that are related to the subject matter of the discipline.
Having a
steward present can help in many ways. The steward can:
 |
Serve as
a witness to prevent supervisors from giving a false account of the
conversation |
 |
Object
to intimidating tactics or confusing questions |
 |
Advise
(when appropriate) an employee against blindly denying everything,
thereby giving the appearance of dishonesty and guilt. |
 |
Help an
employee to avoid making fatal admissions. |
 |
Warn an
employee against losing his or her temper. |
 |
Raise
extenuating factors: |
The
Employee Rights under Weingarten rules are as follows:
-
The
employee may request union representation before or during the
interview. Remember the company does not have to offer union
representation.
-
After
the request, the employer must choose from amount three options:
a.Grant
the request and delay questioning until the union representative
arrives
b.Deny the request and end
the interview immediately.
c.Give the employee a
choice of:
-
Having
the interview without representation (usually a mistake or the
wrong choice) or
-
Ending
the interview (best choice if no union steward is coming)
-
If the
employer denies the request for union representation and questions
the employee, it commits an unfair labor practice and THEN the
employee may refuse to answer.
Although
some supervisors sometimes try to assert that the only function of a
steward at an investigatory interview is to observe the discussion in
other words be a SILENT witness this is WRONG. The steward has the
right to counsel the employee during the interview and to assist the
employee to present the facts. Legal cases have established the
following rights and obligations of the steward.
-
When the
steward arrives, the supervisor must inform the employee and the
steward of the subject matter of the interview: for example, the
type of misconduct, which is being investigated. (The supervisor
does not, however, have to reveal management’s entire case.)
-
The
steward can take the employee aside for a private pre-interview
conference before the questioning begins.
-
The
steward can speak during the interview. (But, the steward has no
right to bargain over the purpose of the interview or to obstruct
the interview.)
-
The
steward can advise the employee not to answer questions that are
abusive, misleading, badgering, confusing or harassing.
-
When the
questioning ends, the steward can provide information to justify the
employee’s conduct.
If
called to a meeting with management, read the following statement to
management BEFORE the meeting starts!!
"If this discussion could in any way lead to my being
disciplined or terminated, or affect my personal working conditions,
I respectfully request that my union representative, officer, or
steward be present at this meeting. Without representation present,
then.....I choose not to participate in this discussion."
|
|
|
 |
|
g
|